STRENGTHEN & RESPECT LAST QUALIFYING EXAMINATION RATHER THAN INTRODUCING ENTRY/EXIT EXAMINATIONS
University Thought Process Lab
Thought Process:
The Central/State Government gradually
executing the new testing methods for students by introducing new Entrance/Exit
Examinations and now this became the fashion trends in testing system to
introduce Exit Examinations for almost
every discipline which are forcefully imposing on students.
It is suppose to
be happen that; the Government makes it mandatory for every graduate to appear
for an 'Exit Exam' but Exit Exam renders Higher Education System
redundant. Universities are authorized entity by the Government to develop
curriculum, conduct examinations and award degrees and competent enough to
execute all. Introducing new exam patterns over existing examination is not a right
path to improve education and evaluation quality.
Rather than implementing the Entry/Exit Exam
System, the government has to think about to increase the effort put forth to
improve the quality of the education and strengthen the evaluation process. There is no need of these kinds of experiments to impose
on students. There is only need to
strengthen the Higher Education evaluation System so that the last qualifying
examination marks could be considered as final outcomes of students learning
skills.
In my Opinion, students should be accountable
for what they have learned in entire duration of their program and across the Nation
only single exam system should be implemented by the Central Government for
Secondary (10th) and Senior Secondary Education(12th) level and the standardized 10th & 12th
examinations should be conducted by Central Examination Agency like National
Testing Agency (NTA) or Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) with the help of State Governments in two choice of languages i.e. English &
State Language. The passing criteria should be same for both mode of languages
and the Central Government decide the minimum Percentage for Merit of every
discipline for Higher Education/Recruitment.
Syllabus of all undergraduate programs should
be as per society and industry needs including studies of subjects like Human
Ethics & values, Moral Education, Analytic & Aptitude based Knowledge, General
Knowledge, Skill oriented knowledge of particular discipline etc. so that students
will seriously concentrate on their studies and can enjoy their curriculum throughout
their student life. There will be no more burden remains on students for taking
extra coaching to qualify the other Entrance/Exit Exams and Students can focus
on their studies with full concentration. However, the Exit Exam policies may
have adverse effects on students during preparation of their final year
examination. Most of students give weightage to only their competitive
examinations & coachings that affects on their overall performance and they
obtaining low grades/less marks in their School/University Examinations ultimately
students are suffering a lot due to these complicated education policies resultant
to increasing drop-out rates due to lack of concentration in their core
studies, extra mental and psychological burden on students to qualify the
entrance examinations, wastage of their time and money and increasing rate of unemployability
and unfortunately thousands of students across the country also commit suicide
every year who face failure in examination, unemployment
and depression due to high pressure of Entrance Exams.
If Government put efforts to strengthen the
quality of education with required modifications in curriculum may be called as
‘National Curriculum’; comprises 70 % core subjects, 20 % Skill Based and 10 %
Value Added Courses and by giving weightage to student’s last qualifying
examination scores so that student’s could be motivated to gain adequate
knowledge of their curriculum and will obtain good score. They will not need to
spend their money on special coachings and their valuable time & money will
also save. Universities should be authorized for declaration of Merit for entry
into next level for higher education or jobs as well as to be registered as a
professional in their respective Registration Councils on the basis of students
last qualifying examinations score without any Exit Exam. If Students not secure good marks should be
given an opportunity to reappear in examination to improve their score card. In addition the Government should train group
of teachers as a National Assessor for assessment of skill based courses and
declare “National Skill Assessor Board”. The Board provides facility to each
& every University to assess their student’s skills.
The Government should promote and give
weightage to students last qualifying examination score by providing various
scholarship and fellowships to those students who obtained higher marks in
their last qualifying School/University examination. Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s
University, Jaipur adopted the same policies since its inception to provide
subsidy to meritorious students who obtained good score in their last
qualifying examinations at their entry level and fellowship provided to those
students who did hard work throughout entire duration of their program to obtain highest marks.
We designed a following
suggestive curriculum chart that may give a single exam solution to all students
for their next level higher education /Registration in professional Programs/Merit
for Recruitments Purpose as Current year pass out students could be considered
for Merit List and previous year pass out students may also considered for
Waiting List.
|
Curriculum
|
|||||||||
|
Core subjects (70%)
|
Skill Based Subjects (20%)
|
Valued Added Subjects (10%)
|
Total
(100%)
|
Entry level
of
Employability
(Consider For Government Jobs and
Eligible for Registration in Professional Fields )
|
Entry level
of
Higher Education
(Consider For Higher Education in
Any University)
All University
declare their own Merit List
|
||||
Marks
|
percentage
|
Marks
|
Percentage
|
Marks
|
Percentage
|
Overall performance
Marks Percentage
|
||||
Max. Marks
|
70
|
100%
|
20
|
100%
|
10
|
100%
|
100
|
100%
|
||
Minimum Eligibility Score/
Marks
|
60
|
86%
|
18
|
90%
|
8
|
80%
|
86
|
86%
|
Eligible for Administrative, Science & Research Services
like
IAS, IPS,
Public Services etc.
|
Eligible for Medical &
Engineering Disciplines
|
55
|
78%
|
15
|
75%
|
5
|
50%
|
75
|
75%
|
Eligible for
Medical & Technical & Teacher Education Services
|
Eligible for Management & Commerce and Teacher
Education Disciplines
|
|
45
|
64%
|
10
|
50%
|
3
|
30%
|
58
|
58%
|
Eligible For
Arts & Other Ministerial Services
|
Eligible For Arts, Humanities
& Other Disciplines
|
|
·
Students secured below 58 %
marks are eligible to apply for defence
Services/Jobs such as Police, Army etc.
|
I am sharing my opinion for debate on National issue ‘Entrance/Exit Exam' and wider discussions are needed from all stakeholders for right solution. So kindly share your views.
Dr. Panckaj Garg
Founder & Advisor
Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur
Sar Mujhe certificate chahie
ReplyDeleteCertificate chahie certificate original
ReplyDeleteName-Happy Choudhary
ReplyDeleteEnrollment-jv-i/16/9470
Course-b.sc-b.ed(pcm)8th sem.
Department of education and methodology
Entry /exit examination=
Plz sir don't take offline examination ,,becozz my parents not allowed to me ,,for going out to home .....this period is very risky for our ..
An exit examination is a test that students must pass to receive a diploma and graduate from school. Such examinations have been used in a variety of countries; this article focuses on their use within the United States.[1] These are usually criterion-referenced tests which were implemented as part of a comprehensive standards-based education reform program which sets into place new standards intended to increase the learning of all students.
When any test is directly tied to significant consequences, such as determining whether the student may receive a high school diploma, it is called a high-stakes test. Many organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) oppose high-stakes tests in general, with the NCTM saying that "placing too much emphasis on a single test or on testing can undermine the quality of education and jeopardize equality of opportunity."[2] At the same time, almost all states that hold an exit exam for graduation allow students to take the test multiple times and further allow routes to graduation for students that fail.
In 2011, 24 states required passing a high school exit examination for graduation, and three additional states had legislation instituting such exams in the future.[3]